SDM reference manual
Seed-based d Mapping (formerly Signed Differential Mapping) or SDM is a statistical technique for meta-analyzing studies on differences in brain activity or structure which used neuroimaging techniques such as fMRI, VBM, DTI or PET. It may also refer to a specific piece of software created by the SDM Project to carry out such meta-analyses.
Overview of the method
SDM adopted and combined various positive features from previous methods, such as ALE or MKDA, and introduced a series of improvements and novel features. One of the new features, introduced to avoid positive and negative findings in the same voxel as seen in previous methods, was the representation of both positive differences and negative differences in the same map, thus obtaining a signed differential map ('SDM'). Another relevant feature, introduced in version 2.11, was the use of effect sizes (leading to effect-size SDM or 'ES-SDM'), which allows combination of reported peak coordinates with statistical parametric maps, thus allowing more exhaustive and accurate meta-analyses. And yet another improvement, introduced in version 4.11, was the use of anisotropic kernels during the recreation of effect size maps in order to account for the anisotropy in the spatial covariance.
The method has three steps. First, coordinates of cluster peaks (e.g. the voxels where the differences between patients and healthy controls were highest), and statistical maps if available, are selected according to SDM inclusion criteria. Second, coordinates are used to recreate statistical maps, and effect-sizes maps and their variances are derived from t-statistics (or equivalently from p-values or z-scores). Finally, individual study maps are meta-analyzed using several tests to complement the main outcome with sensitivity and heterogeneity analyses.
Inclusion criteria for peak coordinates
It is not uncommon in neuroimaging studies that some regions (e.g. a priori regions of interest) are more liberally thresholded than the rest of the brain. However, a meta-analysis of studies with such intra-study regional differences in thresholds would be biased towards these regions, as they are more likely to be reported just because authors apply more liberal thresholds in them. In order to overcome this issue SDM introduced a criterion in the selection of the coordinates, which can be summarized as:
" While different studies may employ different thresholds, you should ensure that the same threshold throughout the whole brain was used within each included study "
Pre-processing of studies
After conversion of statistical parametric maps and peak coordinates to MNI space, an SDM map is created for each study within a specific mask (e.g. for gray matter, white matter, TBSS, cerebrospinal fluid and etcetera). Pre-processing of statistical parametric maps is straighforward, while pre-processing of reported peak coordinates requires recreating the clusters of difference by means of an anisotropic un-normalized Gaussian Kernel, so that voxels more correlated with the peak coordinate have effect-sizes similar to those of the peak, according to specific gray matter, white matter, fractional anisotropy or cerebrospinal fluid correlation templates. Within a study, values obtained by close anisotropic kernels are combined by square-distance-weighted averaging.
SDM provides several different statistical analyses in order to complement the main outcome with sensitivity and heterogeneity analyses.
- The main statistical analysis is the mean analysis, which consists in calculating the mean of the voxel values in the different studies. This mean is weighted by the inverse of the variance and accounts for inter-study heterogeneity (QH maps).
- Subgroup analyses are mean analyses applied to groups of studies to allow the study of heterogeneity.
- Linear model analyses (e.g. meta-regression) are a generalization of the mean analysis to allow comparisons between groups and the study of possible confounds. It must be noted that a low variability of the regressor is critical in meta-regressions, so they are recommended to be understood as exploratory and to be more conservatively thresholded.
- Jack-knife analysis consists in repeating a test as many times as studies have been included, discarding one different study each time, i.e. removing one study and repeating the analyses, then putting that study back and removing another study and repeating the analysis, and so on. The idea is that if a significant brain region remains significant in all or most of the combinations of studies it can be concluded that this finding is highly replicable.
The statistical significance of the analyses is checked by standard randomization tests. It is recommended to use uncorrected p-values = 0.005, as this significance has been found in this method to be approximately equivalent to a corrected p-value = 0.05. A false discovery rate (FDR) = 0.05 has been found in this method to be too conservative. Values in an atomical label or coordinate can also be extracted for further processing or graphical presentation.
SDM is software written by the SDM project to aid the meta-analysis of voxel-based neuroimaging data. It is distributed as freeware including both a command-line and a graphical interface.